Alex Salmond demands that the British Prime minister ceases ‘interfering in Scottish affairs’ over the staging of a referendum on independence. This seems to indicate that the Union of is of no consequence to England whatsoever, yet it is an absolutely key constitutional question, perhaps the biggest for 101 years. Nationalism, the new refuge of the scoundrel, rears its unpleasant face from across the northern border.
What is Nationalism after all? On hearing the word culture Herman Goering reached for his revolver, nationalism leads everyone to eventually reach for theirs. One is supposed to be ‘proud’ of one’s nationality – but why? I might be proud of playing an instrument well, helping my team with a spectacular goal, bringing up a wonderful child, achievements all. I certainly didn’t ‘achieve’ Englishness… I had it trust upon me, is it therefore the same thing as greatness? Of what is there to be so proud? Am I to be proud of my whiteness, my left-handedness, of being born in Pembury Hospital?
My fellow countrymen may be shocked by this lack of patriotism but do they similarly expect a Scot to be proud? Do they think less of him if he does not trumpet his thrill at being Scottish? No… they probably think him sad and a little ridiculous if he does. If not him, what about a Spaniard, a Chaddian, an Albanian? Do we admire them all the more if they strut around professing their love of country and singing the national anthem while thrusting their chins at the horizon? No… we find them ridiculous and so we should.
I’ve heard the arguments regarding the economics of the union, who benefits, who subsidizes who and one thing is for sure, since the figures can be made to come out either way there cannot be much in it; whatever the desire for Scots independence it is not primarily an economic one. No…it is all about the obsession of our times- ‘identity’ - that phantom denominator of phony worthiness. For this we must draw a new and darker line on the map between our two countries and, once that line is there, we can find some real stuff to fight about. North sea oil, fishing rights, trade agreements, immigration, extradition or the very border itself.
Are Scots demeaned, defamed or discriminated against south of the border? It seems not, Scots have occupied positions of power and influence in Britain for centuries. Many Scots from Sean Connery to Ronnie Corbett and Billy Connolly are to found in the national treasure chest. There have been many Scottish Prime ministers and even an English prime minister, Alec Douglas Home, who claimed to be Scottish, though this was denied by many from north of the border – hardly a sign of discrimination by the British establishment.
Once counties disagree the ultimate arbiter is not the right or wrong of either position but the willingness of one human to fire bullets into the body of another. National identity is, ultimately, backed by an army. This maybe fanciful but once the two countries are separated the onus will be on each to outfox the other and get whatever they can over on one another. Co-operation, that most valuable of human traits, will be replaced by competition. Our nature will defeat our civilization, something we have spent millennia struggling painfully away from. All this may not happen right now but one thing is for sure… once Scotland is an independent nation and history has marched us down the road a generation or two they CAN happen. Having seen what the Balkanization of the Balkans can bring about who would want to take even a single step in that direction?
Sectarianism, already rife in Scotland, can only blossom once the border has been set. Once the power game can actually produce a winner the two communities will feel bound to compete for it lest they lose out to those they perceive as likely to oppress them. What then, another border dividing the Protestants and Catholics of Scotland?
The EU has more or less crippled itself in the pursuit of economic and political union…something that would have bought the counties of that union a far more politically and economically powerful position than they have separately. We have that in place with Scotland and yet, if Salmond is to have his way, we are to abandon it. To satisfy the emotional longings of a lot of chin pointers and flag wavers?
For better or worse we are in this together and to tear it apart on what, in the long term, amounts to a political whim, is capricious in the extreme. The union, like any marriage, may not be prefect but is infinitely preferable to the nasty squabbles over the island home we will still have to share, even if the Decree Nisi is eventually granted to Mr Salmond and his Nationalists.